SQM Replication Project Update 15-05-05.

Hi Everyone, I have not received a yes or no about permission yet to put this information up but I am going to do it any way. It is very important and if the author would like it taken down then the author can let me know and I will remove it right away. I apologise if this causes any problems to the Author but I must say good work and this sounds like the closest replication thus far of the SQM. I also have found a good web site that shows the E-Field in a java applet: http://www.cco.caltech.edu/~phys1/java/phys1/EField/EField.html

The Motional E-Field.

This is one of my most interesting projects that I have kept private. While experimenting for several years on this project, I decided to release what information I have concerning this extremely exciting subject. The experiments I will explain could Kill you. Use Extreme caution. You have been warned, proceed at your own risk.

Lots of folks have tried in vain to build a machine that exploits the Motional E Field. The problem is a basic understanding of HOW it works. Notice, I did not say why it works. I don’t have a clue as to WHY it works. I have read everything I could find on the subject, it is vague on what’s out there about it. I will leave WHY it works to Bearden, Sweet, Kaluza-Klien and others who profess to know this. I do recommend reading "Nothing is Something" by Floyd Sweet found with a good search program. But even then he is trying to explain where this mystery potential is coming from, instead of explaining how to actually build a device to produce it.

A normal wound coil has induction. A Bifilar coil connected in reverse-Parallel {Ends Tied} has very little. We will use both in a device to exploit the MEF. The experiment will be just that, not a full time working device ready to power your house or car. Purchase {3} rolls of 24 gauge at 100 feet each magnet wire. I use the GC brand part# L3-612. Gather {2} empty plastic spools with a 1 inch bore. The GC brand comes on these 1 inch bore spools, very handy. Take {2} rolls of the 24 gauge wire and wind them on a empty spool. We are making a bifilar coil. Take your time and wind it carefully keeping the wires together as you wind. You need good balanced bifilar coil. Make sure the wires are the same length, 100 feet. When you get through, clip the ends equal and tie them together. Now test your bifilar wire. It must NOT conduct any electrical potential and or current. Hold it next to a spinning magnet assembly of sorts with a good meter set on AC. Nothing.... it must not conduct anything, this is very important. The bifilar coil will be your pick up coil, but NOT as NORMAL electrical conduction. Take your last roll of wire and leave it on the spool and we will use it as the exciter coil. These coils have no cores, and you will see why later.

Find or purchase {2} ferrite magnets 2" x 6" x 1" will do. We are only doing an experiment.

You will not have a continuous output, so go this route first. Do not use Neo's, their lattice domains are very tight. You will have to demagnetize these magnets to about 10 to 20 gauss. How you do it is up to you. One can wrap the magnets with magnet wire and dump cap voltage against the fields, or use heat. This is common, so I won’t go into that procedure here. Once the magnets are demagnetized, we need to treat them. We need to impress a 60 Hz field in the now loosened domains of the magnets. Wrap the magnets separately with 100 feet of #19 or #20 wire each. Wire these in series and connect them to a veriac on the lowest level. Go do something else for 2 or 3 hours. You can build conditioning coils on forms that slide over the magnets for easy removal and installation. After 2 or 3 hours remove the coils and check the magnets with a scope. You should see a weak 60 hz signal on the magnets. Carefully place the bifilar coil and the exciter coil between the {2} magnets. Space them as far apart as possible without the spools hanging off the edges of the magnets. use plastic ties to keep them in place.

Connect the Exciter coil to a generator at 8 to 12 volts at 2 to 3 ma at 60hz. Place a load across the bifilar coil, such as a light. See if the bulb will flash. If it does, place more bulbs in line with the load. It may even blow the bulb. This field is regulated by load. You may have to experiment with the exciter voltage to get the effect to occur. All one wishes to do is vibrate the magnet. do not overdrive the magnet with the exciter voltage. This will not last long, the magnets will loose the 60Hz signal. Perhaps Barium ferrite IS needed to keep the 60hz signal or the whole design is not shielded properly or it will always run down. Barium has high electron emissivity and promotes electron scattering when excited. The point is: Something of the electrical nature lit the bulbs from a non-conductive coil. The bifilar coil was not connected to anything but the bulbs placed between the {2} treated magnets.

Now, HOW it works. As current flows through a wire the electrons act like magnets when they MOVE. Now if they don’t move, they just have a electrical field around them. If we move this current through the bifilar coil, the magnetism cancels. But moving the electron magnetism will actually add. The magnet domains have been loosened. Their domains are not locked in a position they can shuttle some what within the structure. But they still have a very small amount of magnetism. It is like billions of small magnets vibrating about the domains because of the 60hz exciter coil. They also have a 60hz signal that we supplied to the magnets. Because they have a slight charge on top of being small magnets the E-Field will manifest into the bifilar coil. But this is not the normal conductive current. In fact any normal conductive current abounds, it will cancel the effect. This is the reason the bifilar coil must be made so carefully. You MUST have the least amount of induction in your bifilar coil as possible. This is the reason I use no core. I want a small exciter signal that does not interfere with the bifilar coil, so the exciter coil has no core either.

All the exciter coil does is vibrate the domains which have the 60hz signal placed on all those billions of atoms already that are very slightly magnetized in the domains. Moving a electrical charge against another charge by separate wire cancels the magnetism in both wires and adds.

This is the Motional E-Field.     

3-1-03

I have done some brief experiments to try to verify this work but not yet had any success. I am very excited about this and will continue in this area as well as the conventional video data from Mr Sweet and Mr Bearden.

I also got this Email that is very interesting and sheds some light on magnet conditioning:

Hi Chris,

I was looking at your website especially the John Bedini and Tom Bearden inputs. Peter Bruce Quoted Sweet as follows regarding magnet conditioning during a discussion:

"Searl activated his magnets in a fluxgate furnace in a manner different from Sparky's method".  

About Searl's method of magnet conditioning here is a description sent to me some 15 years ago by the late Gunnar Sandberg who met and investigated Searl's claims:

"The Magnetisation method used by Searl : The coil used by Searl to magnetise molded cores was originally intended for and used to demagnetise (degaussing) turbine shafts and generator shafts and consisted of approximately 200 turns of heavy electric copper wire normally used for connecting electric cookers to the mains. The magnetising current was 180 amperes and supplied by a westinghouse three phase mercury rectifier. The on-off cycle lasted seconds rather than fractions of a second.

Based on what can only be described as intuition, Searl suggested that a second winding be added to the existing magnetising DC-Coil and connected to an AC source. This proposition created heated discussion amongst his fellow workers as to the effect of such a magnetising method. The general view was that the magnetic field created by an alternating current would partly cancel the magnetic field created by the direct current and make the coil less efficient. However Searl suggested that the existing RF signal generator in the laboratory should be used as an AC source; this would prevent cancellation of the DC field. This idea was met with even greater scepticism as the current supplied by the signal generator would be minute and have an insignificant effect on the magnetising process. Searl persisted however with his views and eventually suceeded in winning his manager's approval. Searle can remember his manager carrying out certain calculations concerning the design of the AC winding which were beyond Searl's comprehension at the time, however based on fundamental electrical engineering, it can be assumed that the calculation involved resonance and characteristic impedance determinations in order to avoid shorting out the signal generator".

This suggests that the Sweet's idea came from hearing about Searl. Also Searl used bonded cores rather than sintered material. Seale magnetised roller had tracks of n-s-n poles all the way round.

Going back to Sweet He also says "Magnets are spaced 2" apart in traction mode The excitation coil is inside the and is bifilar and wound to cause space stress in the magnets. The exciatation is very weak but apparently moves the traction flux. The kernal flux of the conditioned magnet is cancelled out at least 1" from the pole faces, the central airgap flux is made to appear and dissappear in step with the space stress caused by the excitation coil."

The bifilar coil idea seems to originate from Hooper's motional-field experiments.

Regards

Mike Watson

Thanks Mike for the excellent Info.